Choosing An Open-Source CMS, Part 2: Why We Use Joomla
In this, the second installment of our three-part series on finding the best open-source content management system (CMS) for your needs, we asked two organizations that use Joomla to explain why they felt that Joomla was the best choice for them, how the transition went, and whether they're happy with the results.
(To find out why other users chose Drupal, be sure to check out part 1 of this series; WordPress will be next.)
Joomla hasn't been around as long as WordPress or Drupal -- the first version debuted in 2005 when it split off from the Mambo open-source community. The Joomla community stakes its claim in the middle ground between its two open-source competitors: the sophisticated but complex Drupal and the more accessible WordPress. It offers an ease of use closer to that of WordPress while delivering some of Drupal's power and flexibility, according to Paul Orwig, president of Open Source Matters, the nonprofit that supports the Joomla open source initiative.
- Tags:
- Boston Children's Hospital (BCH)
- Brian Luzzi
- CloudAccess
- content management system (CMS)
- Drupal
- healthcare
- Jonathan Gafill
- Joomla
- open source
- open source software (OSS)
- Paola Abello
- Paul Orwig
- security
- Social media
- Social Platform for Accelerating Resources and Connections (SPARC)
- social software
- user experience
- user interface (UI)
- VideoRay
- Wordpress
- Login to post comments