Health Information Exchange Resist Cures (Part 2)
previous section of this paper introduced problems found in HIE by two reports: one from the Office of the National Coordinator and another from experts at the Oregon Health & Science University. Tracing the causes of these problems is necessarily somewhat speculative, but the research helps to confirm impressions I have built up over the years.
TheThe ONC noted that developing HIE is very resource intensive, and not yet sustainable. (p. 6) I attribute these problems to the persistence of the old-fashioned, heavyweight model of bureaucratic, geographically limited organizations hooking together clinicians. (If you go to another state, better carry your medical records with you.) Evidence of their continued drag on the field appeared in the report:
Grantees found providers did not want to login to “yet another system” to access data, for example; if information was not easily accessible, providers were not willing to divert time and attention from patients. Similarly, if the system was not user friendly and easy to navigate, or if it did not effectively integrate data into existing patient records, providers abandoned attempts to obtain data through the system... (pp. 76-77)
- Tags:
- AHRQ webinar
- Andy Oram
- Behavioral health
- corrections departments
- Direct protocol
- emergency medical services. interoperability
- FHIR
- health care providers
- HIE
- HITECH
- home health
- LOINC
- long-term care
- Office of the National Coordinator
- ONC
- open interfaces
- Open Protocols
- open standards
- Oregon Health & Science University
- public health
- school-based settings
- semantic interoperability
- SNOMED CT
- substance abuse
- Login to post comments