That Was The Open Access Week That Was
A round-up of some of the issues that got an airing during Open Access (OA) Week and in the days that followed, including more rumination on the implementation and implications of the RCUK OA policy, more bad (and some good) publisher behaviour, ideas for new directions in OA publishing and, finally, an important African perspective on the rumbling debate.
The start of open access week
From 22-28 October 2012 the world celebrated open access week and along with many others I played a part in getting the message out, using a mix of traditional and new-fangled ways.
My week kicked off with a Monday-morning blogpost at Occam’s Corner about a nicely timed paper from Mikael Laakso and Bo-Christer Björk showing that gold open access publications now account for 17% of the approximately 1.7 million research articles published in 2011. This figure, which is based on thorough and clearly-explained sampling methods, is significantly higher than previous estimates and suggests that progress in open access has reacher a higher water-mark than anyone realised.
- Tags:
- Academic Research
- accessibility
- Africa
- Antonio Gasparrini
- Ben Ryan
- Bo-Christer Björk
- Cameron Neylon
- David Willetts
- Deborah Kahn
- Deborah Shorley
- Elsevier
- European Union (EU)
- Eve Gray
- gold open access (OA)
- green open access (OA)
- Heather Piwowar
- Informa
- Marina Kusko
- Mark Thorley
- Melissa Terras
- Mikael Laakso
- Mike Carroll
- open access (OA)
- open access publications
- Open Access Week
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Peter Coles
- Research Councils UK (RCUK)
- Simon Lilley
- Social media
- Steven Harnad
- Login to post comments